|
|
| |
If youth are powerfully influenced by their communities … then changes in community attitudes, relationships, opportunities, and environments are needed…. Successful efforts at changing environments for youth need to engage more than youth workers; instead, whole communities need to be engaged and mobilized.
Cornerstone Consulting Group, Communities and Youth Development: Coming Together, 2001 |
|
| |
|
|
Transitions
Volume 14, No. 3,
April 2002
This Transitions is
also available in [PDF] format.
Community
Participation: What Is It?
By Nicole Cheetham, MHS, Deputy
Director, International Division, Advocates for Youth
A community's members are a rich source of knowledge about their community
and of energy and commitment to that community. When public health professionals
envision a program to address health issues in a particular community,
tapping into the community's expertise and enthusiasm is frequently an
essential issue. Genuine participation by community members, including
youth, is the key. Community members control the project at the same
time that professional partners build the community's capacity to make
informed decisions and to take collective action.
Experience has demonstrated
that people can devise their own … alternatives if they are
allowed to make their own decisions.1
Community participation
is a proven approach to addressing health care issues and has been
long utilized in HIV prevention in the United States and in development
internationally, in projects varying from sanitation to child survival,
clean water, and health infrastructure. However, the quality of participation
varies from project to project. Moreover, in spite of the failure
of many health programs designed without the participation
of target communities, some professionals continue to question the
value of community members' participating in program design, implementation,
and evaluation. This article looks at the critical importance of
community participation in addressing the reproductive and sexual
health of adolescents.
Why Use Community Participation Approaches in Adolescent Reproductive & Sexual
Health Programming?
Youth do not live
in a vacuum, independent of influences around them. Rather, social,
cultural, and economic factors strongly influence young people's
ability to access reproductive and sexual health information and
services. To improve young people's sexual and reproductive health,
therefore, programs must address youth and their environment.
In order to address youth adequately and appropriately, programs
should be designed and implemented with the meaningful involvement
of youth.+ To address youth's
environment, planners must acknowledge that community and families
significantly influence youth.
Programs that ignore the influence of community and family
in the lives of young people are, in fact, creating a
nearly impossible situation—asking
young people to change their world on their own. It is unfair to ask youth
to change their beliefs and behaviors without also providing community support
for these changes. Especially when reproductive and sexual health issues are
controversial and/or taboo, it is critical to bring other community members
into the process so that they, too, can support healthy change.
If implemented properly, community participation can be effective for a number
of reasons.
- Communities have different needs, problems, beliefs,
practices, assets, and resources related to sexual health.
Getting the community involved in program design and implementation
helps ensure that strategies are appropriate for and acceptable
to the community and its youth.
- Community participation promotes shared responsibility
by service providers, community members, and youth themselves
for the sexual health of adolescents in the community.
- When
communities "own" adolescent sexual health
programs, they often mobilize resources that may not
otherwise be available. They can work together to advocate
for better programs, services, and policies for youth.
- Community
support can change structures and norms that pose barriers
to sexual health information and services for youth and
can increase awareness regarding youth's right to information
and treatment.
- Community
participation can increase the accountability of sexual
health programs and service providers.
- Participation
can empower youth within the community.
What Is Community?
"Community" is
important within a public health context. Research demonstrates
that:
- Prevention
and intervention take place at the community level.
- Community
context is an important determinant of health outcomes.
However, the lack of
a commonly accepted definition of community results in different collaborators
forming contradictory or incompatible assumptions about community.
This often undermines their ability to evaluate the contribution of
the community in achieving public health outcomes.
In December 2001, the American Journal of Public Health published
the results of research to define community within a public health context.2 Researchers
identified core dimensions of "community," as defined by people from
diverse groups. Five core elements emerged: locus, sharing, action, ties, and
diversity. A common definition of community emerged:
A group of people
with diverse characteristics who are linked by social ties, share
common perspectives, and engage in joint action in geographical locations
or settings.2
What Is Community Participation?
Although this
may appear to be a simple question, there is no single definition
of participation by communities but, rather, a potpourri of
definitions varying mostly by the degree of participation.
The continuum on the next page provides a helpful framework
for understanding community
participation. In this continuum, "participation" ranges
from negligible or "co-opted"—in which community
members serve as token representatives with no part in making decisions—to "collective
action"—in which local people initiate action, set the
agenda, and work towards a commonly defined goal.
Youth from Burkina Faso offer a practical definition of community participation.
In an example of collective action (see chart below), these youth work with
organizations in their communities to improve adolescent reproductive and sexual
health.*
Community Participation3
|
Mode of Participation |
Type of Participation |
Outsider Control |
Potential for Sustainability, Local Action & Ownership |
Co-opted |
Tokenism
and/or manipulation; representatives are chosen
but have no real power or input. |
***** |
|
Cooperating |
Tasks
are assigned, with incentives. Outsiders decide
agenda and direct the process. |
**** |
* |
Consulted |
Local
opinions are sought. Outsiders analyze data and
decide on course of action. |
*** |
** |
Collaborating |
Local
people work together with outsiders to determine
priorities. Responsibility remains with outsiders
for directing the process. |
** |
*** |
Co-learning |
Local
people and outsiders share their knowledge to
create new understanding and work together to
form action plans with outside facilitation. |
* |
**** |
Collective
Action |
Local
people set the agenda and mobilize to carry it
out, utilizing outsiders, NOT as initiators or
facilitators, but as required by local people. |
|
***** |
Community participation
occurs when a community organizes itself and takes responsibility
for managing its problems. Taking responsibility includes identifying
the problems, developing actions, putting them into place, and following
through.4
Who Benefits from a Community Participation Approach?
Community
participation has many direct beneficiaries when carried out with
a high degree of community input and responsibility. Everyone benefits
when participating in the activities. For example, adults and youth
might participate in village committees to improve services. Everyone
might watch a play or video and learn from presentations about local
programs. Youth benefit from improved knowledge about contraception
and HIV/AIDS or from increased skill in negotiating condom use, and
other community members benefit, too. A truly participatory program
involves and benefits the entire community, including youth, young
children, parents, teachers and schools, community leaders, health
care providers, local government officials, and agency administrators.
Programs also benefit because trends in many nations towards decentralization
and democratization also require increased decision making at the
community level.
What Key Characteristics and Skills Facilitate a Community Participation
Approach?
Above
all, those promoting community participation need to be able to facilitate
a process, rather than to direct it. Facilitators need to have genuine
confidence in a community's members and in their knowledge and resources.
A facilitator should be willing to seek out local expertise and build
on it while bolstering knowledge and skills as needed. Key characteristics
and skills important to facilitating community participation include:
- Commitment
to community-derived solutions to community-based problems
- Political,
cultural, and gender sensitivity
- Ability
to apply learning and behavior change principles and
theories
- Ability
to assess, support, and build capacities in the community
- Confidence
in the community's expertise
- Technical
knowledge of the health or other issue(s) the project
will address
- Ability
to communicate well, especially by actively listening
- Ability
to facilitate group meetings
- Programmatic
and managerial strengths
- Organizational
development expertise
- Ability
to advocate for and defend community-based solutions
and approaches.5,6
What Key Challenges Face Community Participation Programs?
Community participation also poses important challenges. Two
are highlighted here.
Evaluating Participation
One challenge for program planners is how to evaluate community
participation. In particular, what should be evaluated—health
outcomes, participation levels, improved capacities, or some combination
of these—and how will they be evaluated? While measuring
health outcomes—such as birth rates or sexual health knowledge,
attitudes, and behaviors in a particular age group—may be
fairly straight forward, it will be important for community
participation programs also to identify and measure indicators
of participation.
One of the goals is to achieve participation. Whether
planners want to measure changes in community self-efficacy
or changes in local capacity to identify and solve problems, it
is
important to define these objectives clearly and to
develop appropriate tools for measuring progress toward the objectives.
Qualitative
tools (or some combination of qualitative and quantitative)
may be most appropriate to assess the subjective quality of "participation," but
indicators of participation and ways of assessing it
should be defined by the community, and community members should
decide and
carry out the evaluation.
Scaling Up Participatory Models
Increasingly, funding sources express interest in programs
that have potential for "scaling up." Community participation
programs present some obstacles to "scaling up" due to
their deliberately and intensely local nature. As a program develops
and matures, program planners may face the challenge of "scaling
down" the intensity of community participation in order to "scale
up" the project without compromising its participatory nature
and results.
Conclusion
Community participation is a vitally important strategy in efforts
to work with youth to improve their sexual and reproductive
health. Community participation is a strategy that respects the rights
and
ability of youth and other community members to design
and implement programs within their community. Community participation
opens the
way for community members—including youth—to act responsibly.
Whether a participatory approach is the primary strategy
or a complementary one, it will greatly enrich and strengthen programs
and help achieve
more sustainable, appropriate, and effective programs in
the field.
References:
- Bhatnagar B et
al. Participatory
Development and the World Bank.
[World Bank Discussion Paper] Washington, DC: The
World Bank, 1992.
- MacQueen KM et
al. What is community?
An evidence-based definition for participatory public
health. Am J Pub Health 2001;91:1929-1938.
- Cornwall A.
Training handout. [s.l.],
1995.
- Advocates for
Youth. Unpublished data from the Burkina Project. Washington,
DC: 2001.
- National Institutes
of Health. Theory at a Glance:
A Guide for Health Promotion Practice.
Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National
Cancer Institute, [1995?].
- Howard-Grabman
L, Snetro G. How to Mobilize
Communities for Health and Social Change.
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Center for
Communication Programs, forthcoming.
+ For
more information on forming effective youth-adult partnerships, see Transitions,
volume 14, no. 1, October 2001, available at www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/transitions/transitions1401.htm.
* The project is described briefly
on page 7 and stories of participants follow on pages 8 and 9.
Transitions (ISSN 1097-1254) © 2002, is a quarterly publication of Advocates for Youth—Helping young people make safe and responsible decisions about sex. For permission to reprint, contact Transitions' editor at 202.419.3420.
Editor: Sue Alford
Click here to view the Publications Catalog and/or
to order this publication.
|