Home >> Publications >> Five Years of Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Education: Assessing the Impact >> Table I: Short- and Long-Term Impact of State Abstinence-Only Programs
 

         

 

ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH

 

  2000 M Street NW, Suite 750 ● Washington, DC 20036 ● P: 202.419.3420 ● F: 202.419.1448

 
 


    ||  About Us  Library  Search  ||  Join Our Campaigns  Take Action

 



 
Advocates for Youth
   

Five Years of Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Education: Assessing the Impact [PDF]

Table I: Short- and Long-Term Impact of State Abstinence-Only Programs

  Evaluation Design Short-Term Impact Long-Term Impact
State Pretest-Posttest? Follow-up Survey? Comparison Group? Attitudes Towards Abstinence Intent to Abstain Sexual Behavior Attitudes Towards Abstinence Intent to Abstain Sexual Behavior
AZ1 yes 3 to 13 mos. no increased increased * decreased decreased increased
CA pre-only at 3 and 17 mos. yes mixed no impact no impact no impact no impact no impact
FL yes no no increased increased increased * * *
IA2 yes no no mixed mixed increased * * *
MD yes unclear3 unclear3 no impact no impact no impact * * *
MN4 yes at 1 year no * * * mixed decreased increased
MO5 yes at 4 mos. yes no impact * no impact no impact * no impact
NE6 yes not yet available yes no impact no impact * not yet available not yet available not yet available
OR yes not yet available no increased no impact * not yet available not yet available not yet available
PA varied only one program varied mixed mixed mixed no impact7 increased7 no impact7
WA yes no yes increased increased * * * *

* Indicates that the evaluation study did not report on this indicator.

  1. Evaluation results are with teens only.
  2. Results in this chart reflect the pretest/posttest survey with abstinence-only programs. (A comprehensive analysis of Iowa's abstinence-only program with the state's comprehensive sex education program is discussed on the Iowa page.
  3. Advocates was unable to secure the report from the Maryland evaluation and so was unable to assess the study's design.
  4. Evaluation results are from follow-up surveys.
  5. Results are from the second evaluation (using follow-up and comparison group) of Life's Walk program.
  6. Results are from the evaluations of FACTS and WAIT programs in Nebraska.
  7. Results are from the long-term evaluation of the LaSalle University program.

<< Previous Section

Next Section >>

Return to the Introduction, Discussion, and Conclusion

Arizona

Source/Citation:
Hauser D. Five Years of Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Education: Assessing the Impact. Washington, DC: Advocates for Youth, 2004.

Click here to view the Publications Catalog and/or to order this publication.

   
   

  

 

 

YOUNG PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO SEXUAL HEALTH INFORMATION & SERVICES.  DONATE TO ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH TODAY >>

 

   
 

 

ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH

 

 

  2000 M Street NW, Suite 750 ● Washington, DC 20036 ● P: 202.419.3420 ● F: 202.419.1448

 


<< make advocates for youth your homepage


terms of use >> top of page >> home >>