| Focus in Kids Plus ImPACT |
|
Program Components
For Use With
Evaluation Methodology
Evaluation Findings
Evaluators' Comments: These data suggest that properly designed risk-reduction interventions can exert sustained effects over a broad array of behaviors... The evidence from this study suggests that to have this effect, interventions will require multiple delivery approaches. In this intervention, we used face-to-face strategies addressing youth and their parents. Program DescriptionThis community-based intervention has two integral and one optional components:
Evaluation MethodologyThe quasi-experimental, randomized, longitudinal evaluation was conducted in Baltimore MD. Participants were recruited in three waves from 35 low-income public housing developments across the city. Randomization occurred at the level of the 35 sites after all youth at all sites within the recruitment wave had been identified. Thirteen sites were randomized to receive FOK only; 11sites were randomized to receive FOK plus ImPACT (FOK+I); and 11 sites were randomized to receive FOK plus ImPACT plus boosters (FOK+I+b). Thus, evaluation compared receiving only one component with receiving two components and receiving three components. At baseline, youth's risk behaviors were assessed by self-report. All participants were African American and lived in the low-income, urban public housing developments. At baseline, 45 percent of FOK only participants were male compared to 38 percent of FOK+I and 42 percent of FOK+I+b. The median age in all groups was 14. Among those who were present at 24-month follow-up, there were no statistically significant baseline differences between youth in the three conditions regarding proportions who reported ever having had sex, having had anal sex, having smoked cigarettes, having drunk alcohol, or having used marijuana. However, among those who failed to appear for 24-month follow-up, baseline differences were statistically significant for FOK only participants in ever having had sex (51 percent; P<.01) and for FOK+I (49 percent; P<.05) when compared to FOK+I+b (45 percent). Baseline differences between the three groups were controlled for in final analysis. The questionnaire was administered aurally and visually by a talking MacIntosh computer. For assessing intervention effects on youth risk involvement and youth's perceptions of parental monitoring and communications, the mean score differences between FOK-only and FOK+I were compared at six and 12 months after the intervention. Because the booster sessions began only at seven months after the intervention, booster effects were assessed only at 12 months post-intervention. Long-Term Impact
Note: It may be of value to program planners to know about behavioral findings irrelevant to the purpose of Science & Success. Compared with FOK only participants, FOK+I and FOK+I+b participants were significantly less likely to have carried a bat or stick to use as a weapon (P=.021), to have smoked cigarettes (P=.003) or to have used illicit drugs (P=.015) and significantly more likely to have asked a recent partner about condom use (P=.037). The program is packaged as Focus on Youth plus ImPACT. For More Information or to Order, Contact
|








