|
Teenage Pregnancy, The Case for Prevention [PDF]
Estimates of Federal Expenditures
Support and Services to Families Begun by a Birth to a Teen
Advocates for Youth calculated the federal expenditures in fiscal year
1996 by adding up the costs of resources allocated to provide support
and services to families that began with a birth to a teen. Advocates
for Youth included families headed by adult females who were teens when
they had their first child. The various programs included in the expenditure
calculation are discussed below.§§
Fiscal Year 1996 Federal Expenditures
to Support Families Begun with a Birth to a Teen |
Medicaid |
$18.4 billion |
Aid
to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) |
$7.0 billion |
Food
Stamp Program |
$10.6 billion |
Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants,
and Children (WIC) |
$2.0 billion |
Social
Services Block Grant (SSBG) |
$11.9 million |
Maternal
and Child Health Services Block Grant |
$2.5 million |
Adolescent
Family Life (AFL) Program |
$5.2 million |
Total
Federal Expenditures |
$38.0 billion††† |
|
(A) Benefits |
$16.4 billion |
|
(B) Administration |
$2.0 billion |
In fiscal year 1996, the federal government spent nearly $18.4 billion
($18,388,027,095) on Medicaid to support families begun with a birth
to a teen. More than $16.4 billion ($16,400,376,285) was for direct benefits
to recipients and nearly $2 billion ($1,987,650,810) was for administrative
costs. The annual number of adult Medicaid recipients, eligible based
on AFDC status, was 7,126,807 with average annual Medicaid outlay of
$1,722 per adult. The annual number of child Medicaid recipients, eligible
based on AFDC status, was 16,738,800 with average annual Medicaid outlay
of $1,048 per child. An estimated 55 percent of Medicaid recipients were
teens when their first child was born.
Program Description. Title XIX of the
Social Security Act (Medicaid) is an entitlement program
that pays for medical assistance for vulnerable and needy
individuals and families with low incomes and few resources.
Medicaid is the largest source of funding for medical and
health-related services for the United States' poorest
people. In fiscal year 1996, Medicaid provided health care
assistance to more than 36 million people.28
The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), established
under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS), administers grants to the states to manage Medicaid
benefits. The Medicaid program allows the states considerable
flexibility within their Medicaid plans. However, the federal
government requires states to provide basic services—such
as general health care, prenatal care, vaccines for children,
and family planning services and devices—to categorically
needy populations. Groups eligible to receive Medicaid
coverage include: recipients of Aid to Families and Dependent
Children and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) as well
as pregnant women and children under age six whose family
income is at or below 133 percent of the federal poverty
level. By 2002 under the states' Child Health Insurance
Program (CHIP), all children will be covered who are under
age 19 in families with incomes at or below the federal
poverty level.28
|
Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
|
$7.0 billion |
In fiscal year 1996, the federal government spent about $12.7 billion
($12,698,000,000) on Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC).
An estimated 55 percent of AFDC recipients were teens when their first
child was born. The federal government, therefore, spent approximately
$7 billion ($6,983,900,000) on AFDC to support families begun with a
birth to a teen.
Program Description. Aid to Families
with Dependent Children was established in 1935 as a matching
grant program to enable states to aid needy children without
fathers at home. AFDC was repealed 61 years later by The
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation
Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-193). A block grant to the
states for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
replaced AFDC, effective July 1, 1997, by which time most
states had already implemented TANF.27
Federal fiscal year 1998 was the first full year in which
all states implemented TANF. Because federal fiscal year
1996 is October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996, Advocates
for Youth used figures associated with AFDC to calculate
fiscal year 1996 expenditures and investments. Appendix
C summarizes some major differences between the old (AFDC)
and new (TANF) cash welfare programs for families with
children.27
Before the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act of 1996, AFDC provided transitional
financial assistance to needy families. Federal and state
governments shared the costs associated with AFDC. The
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Family
Assistance, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
administered the program, and the federal government provided
broad guidelines and program requirements. States were
responsible for program formulation, benefits determinations,
and administration. Eligibility for benefits was based
on the state's standard of need as well as the income and
resources available to the recipient.29
Food Stamp Program |
$10.6 billion |
|
(A) Benefits |
$9.7 billion |
|
(B) Administration |
$0.9 billion |
In fiscal year 1996, the federal government spent over $10.6 billion
($10,614,904,072) through the Food Stamp Program to support families
begun with a birth to a teen. Nearly $9.7 billion ($9,697,322,602) was
in direct benefits and over $917 million ($917,581,470) was in administrative
costs. The average monthly number of Food Stamp recipients was 26.9 million,
and each recipient received an average monthly Food Stamp allocation
of $73.30. About nine out of 10 AFDC recipients also received a Food
Stamp allocation. Experts estimate that 47 percent of Food Stamp recipients
were teens when their first child was born.
Program Description. The Food Stamp
Program's purpose is to end hunger and improve nutrition
and health. The program helps low-income households buy
the food needed for a nutritionally adequate diet. State
and local welfare offices operate the Food Stamp Program
and the Food and Nutrition Service of the U.S. Department
of Agriculture oversees the states' operations. The amount
of benefits an eligible household receives depends on the
number of people in the household and the amount of the
household's income.30
Generally, recipients in the two primary cash welfare
programs—AFDC and Supplemental Security Income (SSI)—are
automatically eligible for food stamps if the household
is composed entirely of AFDC or SSI beneficiaries.27
Special Supplemental Nutrition
Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) |
$2.0 billion |
In fiscal year 1996, the federal government spent over $3.6 billion
($3,688,200,000) on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women,
Infants, and Children (WIC). An estimated 55 percent of WIC recipients
were teens at the birth of their first child. The federal government,
therefore, spent more than $2 billion ($2,028,510,000) through WIC to
support families that began with a birth to a teen.
Program Description. The Special Supplemental
Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
provides food, nutrition counseling, and access to health
services for low-income women, infants, and children. Established
in 1974, WIC is administered at the federal level by the
Food and Nutrition Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Formerly known as the Special Supplemental Food Program
for Women, Infants, and Children, WIC's name was changed
in the mid 1990s to emphasize its role as a nutrition program.31
WIC is effective in improving the health of pregnant women,
new mothers, and their infants. Women who participated
in the program during their pregnancies have been shown
to have lower Medicaid costs for themselves and their babies
than did women who did not participate. WIC participation
has also been linked with longer gestation periods, higher
birth weights, and lower infant mortality.31
Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) |
$11.9 million |
In fiscal year 1996, the federal government spent over $11.9 million
($11,905,000) through the Social Services Block Grant to provide pregnancy
and parenting services.
Program Description. Title XX of the
Social Security Act, also referred to as the Social Services
Block Grant (SSBG), is a capped entitlement program, which
gives funds to states to help them achieve a wide range
of social policy goals. States determine which services
they will provide and the groups eligible for these services.
The federal government, however, places some restrictions
on the use of Title XX funds. States cannot use these funds
to provide—among other services—medical care except family
planning, drug rehabilitation, or detoxification services,
and educational services that are generally provided by
schools.
SSBG funds provide both family planning services and pregnancy
and parenting services for teens. Advocates for Youth included
the percentage of funds (0.5 percent) spent to provide
services for pregnant and parenting teens in the calculation
of expenditures.
|
Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant
|
$2.5 million |
In fiscal year 1996, the federal government spent nearly $2.5 million
($2,487,000) through the Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant
to provide pregnancy and parenting services.
Program Description. Title V of the
Social Security Act establishes the Maternal and Child
Health Services Block Grant, the basic authorizing legislation
for the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB). Title
V is a federal/state partnership that supports and develops
community-based programs to improve the health of mothers
and children, ensure quality health care for families,
and create safe and healthy communities.32 The
fiscal year 1996 appropriation for the Maternal and Child
Health Block Grant was over $678 million ($678,204,000).
Eighty-five percent of the block grant passes directly
to the states and 15 percent is reserved for the Maternal
and Child Health Bureau to operate federal projects, such
as Special Projects of Regional and National Significance
(SPRANS), Community Integrated Service System (CISS), and
the Healthy Tomorrows Partnership for Children Program.
MCHB jointly funded 147 demonstration projects with the
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention of the Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration under the
Pregnant and Postpartum Women and their Infants initiative.
Special Projects of Regional and National Significance
(SPRANS) is a set-aside federal program to which
approximately 15 percent of the Title V funds are allocated.
Five categories of projects fall under SPRANS: (1) applied
research; (2) training; (3) genetic disease testing,
counseling, and information dissemination; (4) hemophilia
diagnostic and treatment centers; and (5) maternal and
child health improvement projects (MCHIPs). MCHIPs cover
a range of activities and support the demonstration of
innovative services and new techniques for the delivery
of services. Several SPRANS programs address teen pregnancy
prevention and services for pregnant and parenting teens.33
The Community Integrated Service System (CISS) program
seeks to reduce infant mortality and improve the health
of mothers and children, including those living in rural
areas and those with special health needs. CISS supports
projects to develop and expand integrated services at the
community level. These systems are public/private partnerships
of health-related and other organizations and individuals.
The partnerships collaborate in using community resources
to address community-identified health problems.34
The CISS program was authorized by the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1989 (OBRA 89) as a separate set-aside
federal program of the Maternal and Child Health Services
Block Grant (Title V of the Social Security Act). It did
not become operational, however, until fiscal year 1992
when the total MCH Services Block Grant appropriation exceeded
$600 million for the first time. Under OBRA 89, 12 ¾ percent
of the appropriated amount above $600 million is earmarked
for CISS projects. CISS program funds may be used for programs
to support pregnant and parenting teens.34
Healthy Tomorrows Partnership for Children Program
(HTPCP) is a collaborative effort of the federal
MCHB and the American Academy of Pediatrics. HTPCP aims
to ensure access to quality health care for all children
and pregnant women by promoting innovative, community-based
child health care projects. Of the 54 HTPCP projects
funded in fiscal year 1996, 14 focus on improving the
health status of adolescents. Community projects may
offer primary or secondary pregnancy prevention programs
and/or provide services to support families begun with
a birth to a teen.35
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention's (CSAP) mission
is to provide leadership in the federal effort to prevent
alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug problems that are also
linked to other national problems such as teen pregnancy.
CSAP connects people and resources to innovative ideas
and strategies and encourages efforts to reduce and eliminate
alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use problems in the
United States and internationally. In a joint initiative
with the MCHB, CSAP funds 147 demonstration projects. Several
CSAP programs target teen parents.36
|
Adolescent Family Life (AFL) Program
|
$5.2 million |
In fiscal year 1996, two-thirds of the Adolescent Family Life Program's
total budget ($7,698,000) was dedicated to programs that support families
begun by a birth to a teen. Advocates for Youth calculated that the federal
government spent nearly $5.2 million ($5,157,660) on the Adolescent Family
Life Program to provide programs for pregnant and parenting teens.
Program Description. The Adolescent
Family Life (AFL) Program was enacted in 1981 as Title
XX of the Public Health Service Act. AFL is administered
by the Office of Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention in the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Funding for
AFL is divided between pregnancy prevention initiatives
and care programs for pregnant and parenting teens. AFL
programs focus on developing and promoting abstinence-only
programs and helping teens avoid sexual intercourse. In
fiscal year 1996, the AFL program funded 17 projects in
14 states. Advocates for Youth included only those programs
that focus on providing care services for pregnant and
parenting teens in the expenditure calculation.37
______________________________
§§ Administrative costs are broken
out separately only for those for programs where benefits
equal the monthly or annual allocation and do not include
administrative costs.
††† Columns may not total due to rounding.
Source/Citation:
Feijoo AN. Teenage Pregnancy,
the Case for Prevention: An Updated Analysis of Recent Trends & Federal
Expenditures Associated with Teenage Pregnancy. Washington, DC: Advocates
for Youth, 1999.
Click here to view the Publications
Catalog and/or to order this publication.
|