| Postponing Sexual Involvement, Human Sexuality and Health Screening |
|
|
Science and Success, Second Edition: Sex Education and Other Programs that Work to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections Full Study Report [HTML] [PDF] Program Components
For Use With
Evaluation Methodology
Evaluation Findings
Evaluators' comments: The study's positive findings in reproductive health knowledge and contraceptive use suggest that recruiting outside health professionals to provide education and outreach in the school setting may be a useful prevention strategy. Program DescriptionThis pregnancy and HIV/STI prevention intervention combines elements of two evaluated programs: Postponing Sexual Involvement and Self Center.[**] Here, the Postponing Sexual Involvement peer education curriculum is coupled with individual and small group educational methods, adapted from the Self Center, bringing outside health professionals to provide education and assistance to students in school settings. The goal of the program is to delay students' initiation of sexual intercourse. This intervention is based on social cognitive theory.[9] A full-time health professional serves as the project facilitator and leads three 45-minute classroom sessions for seventh grade classes on reproductive health, including information about abstinence and contraception. These classes are followed by five 45-minute classroom sessions of Postponing Sexual Involvement, led by trained peer educators. The peer educators are 10th and 11th grade students recruited from nearby high schools. Toward the end of the first year of the program, students complete a health risk assessment questionnaire that addresses self-rated health, risk behavior, school performance, physical fitness, social support, and depression. Using a series of questions adapted from GAPS (Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services), health professionals conduct individual interviews with students whose questionnaires indicated substance use, physical abuse, sexual activity, and/or emotional problems.[9] In the fall of the next year, facilitators present the three reproductive health classes again to all eighth grade students. A series of booster activities reinforces the concepts of abstinence and self-care. Booster activities include: brown bag sessions for small, informal groups of no more than 15 students; an eighth grade assembly; and a contest for eighth grade participants, featuring their poetry, artwork, etc. Eight brown bag sessions are offered—one per week, covering a range of adolescent health issues, such as gang violence, drug use, and teen pregnancy. Facilitators speak privately with each student who attends a brown bag session, asking if the student has any questions about the topic or other health related matters. The assembly is presented by health professionals from affiliated clinics. Eighth grade intervention students may also participate in a contest on a topic related to the intervention. Contestants enter poems, songs, essays, drawings, and T-shirt designs.[9] Evaluation MethodologyA non-probability sample of six schools was selected from among 18 middle and junior high schools in the District of Columbia. Schools were chosen based on their proximity to one of the three adolescent health clinics affiliated with the study. Two schools were selected because of their high enrollment of Hispanic students. Schools were paired according to seventh grade class size, location, and racial / ethnic distribution. Pairs of schools were then randomly assigned to the intervention or control group.[9] Of 896 seventh graders enrolled in the six schools at the beginning of the study, 522 received parental consent to participate. Of these, 274 were female (52 percent); 85 percent were African American and about 12 percent were Hispanic. Participants' average age at baseline was 12.8 years. Sixty-three percent of youth participated in the free or reduced price school lunch program. Forty-six percent of students lived with both parents and an equal percentage lived with one parent or with one parent and another adult. The intervention was assessed by comparing the answers of intervention participants and control students at baseline (n=522); at the end of the seventh grade (n=503); at the beginning of eighth grade (n=459); and at the end of eighth grade (n=422).[9] Outcomes
For More Information or to Order, Contact
* For this evaluation, high risk was defined by responses to the health assessment survey, including reports of substance use, physical abuse, sexual activity, and/or emotional problems. |